The idea of a four-day workweek sounds almost too good to be true. A three-day weekend, every single week. More time for family, for hobbies, for travel, or just for catching up on sleep.
For a long time, it felt like a fantasy. But something has shifted. Major companies around the world have started trying it out, and the results have been, to put it mildly, interesting.
So, is this just another corporate fad that will fade away, or are we on the brink of a fundamental change in how we work?
Let’s look at it without the hype and buzzwords. Just a straight-up look at the facts, how it works in practice, and the problems you might run into.
It’s Not About the Day Off, It’s About Productivity
The first thing to get straight is this: the four-day workweek isn’t about working less. It’s about working smarter.
The main model everyone is testing is called “100-80-100.” Here’s what that means:
100% of the pay.
80% of the hours.
For 100% of the productivity.
This isn’t just about getting a long weekend. It’s a complete redesign of the workday. The goal is to force companies and employees to cut out all the things that waste time—pointless meetings, constant interruptions, inefficient processes—and focus only on what creates value.
The extra day off isn’t the goal; it’s the reward for being more efficient.
What the Data Says: The Big Experiments
This isn’t just a theory anymore. Thousands of companies have participated in large-scale trials, and the data is pretty clear.
The largest trial to date, run in the UK by the non-profit 4 Day Week Global, involved dozens of companies and thousands of employees. The results were striking.
- Companies did better. Revenue stayed broadly the same and even rose by an average of 1.4% during the trial. It showed that cutting hours didn’t hurt the bottom line.
- Employees were healthier and happier. 71% of employees reported lower levels of burnout. There were significant drops in anxiety, fatigue, and sleep issues. Physical and mental health improved.
- People didn’t quit. Employee turnover fell by 57%. Companies also found it much easier to attract new talent.
And this isn’t a one-off. Similar results have been seen in trials in the United States, Canada, Australia, and beyond. The pattern is consistent:
When companies switch to a four-day week, business performance stays strong while employee well-being goes through the roof.
How Do Companies Actually Make It Work?
This isn’t magic. You can’t just tell everyone to take Friday off and expect things to run smoothly. Companies that succeed make deep, intentional changes to how they operate.
Here’s what they focus on:
1. Killing the Meeting Culture
The biggest time-waster in most offices is the meeting. Companies on a four-day week are ruthless about cutting them. They ask: “Could this meeting be an email? Or a shared document?”
Meetings that remain are shorter, have clear agendas, and include only the people who absolutely need to be there. The 30-minute default becomes a 15-minute huddle. The hour-long brainstorm becomes a focused 25-minute session.
2. Embracing “Deep Work”
The modern office is a temple of distraction. Constant pings, emails, and “quick questions” make it impossible to focus.
Successful four-day companies create long, uninterrupted blocks of time for “deep work.” This might mean having “no-meeting Wednesdays” or encouraging people to turn off notifications for several hours a day. The focus shifts from being constantly available to being highly productive when you are working.
3. Shifting to Asynchronous Communication
The expectation of an instant response is a productivity killer. It forces everyone to stay tethered to their messaging apps.
Instead, these companies rely on asynchronous communication. Instead of a rapid-fire Slack conversation, the discussion happens in a shared document (like Google Docs or Notion) where people can add their thoughts on their own schedule. It respects people’s focus and leads to more thoughtful responses.
4. Using Technology Intelligently
They automate everything they can. Repetitive tasks, data entry, report generation—if a computer can do it, a computer does it. This frees up human brainpower for the creative, strategic work that actually matters.
But It’s Not a Perfect Solution
It would be dishonest to say this is a silver bullet. There are real challenges and valid criticisms.
It Doesn’t Fit Every Industry
For a software company, it’s relatively easy to implement. But what about a hospital, a restaurant, or a retail store that needs to be open and staffed seven days a week? It’s much harder. Not impossible—some companies use creative shift scheduling—but it requires a lot more planning.
The Risk of Burnout
There’s a danger that the four-day week just becomes five days of work crammed into four. If companies don’t actually change their processes, they just create four longer, more intense, and more stressful workdays. The goal is to reduce the amount of work, not just compress it.
Implementation is Hard Work
This isn’t a switch you can flip overnight. It requires total buy-in from leadership and a willingness to question every single habit the company has. It’s a massive change management project, and many companies simply aren’t ready for that level of introspection.
So, Is It Really the Future?
Probably not in the sense that every single company will adopt a Monday-to-Thursday schedule. The world is too diverse for a one-size-fits-all solution.
But the idea behind the four-day week? That’s absolutely the future.
The traditional 9-to-5, five-day workweek is a relic of the industrial revolution, designed for factory work over a century ago. It makes no sense in a world of knowledge work and instant global communication.
The real future of work is about three things:
- Flexibility: Letting people work when and where they are most productive.
- Autonomy: Trusting people to manage their own time and tasks.
- Results: Focusing on output, not hours spent at a desk.
The four-day week is the most visible and powerful experiment in this direction. It proves that we can break free from outdated models and achieve better results for both businesses and human beings.
The conversation it has started is arguably more important than the model itself. It’s forcing us all to ask a fundamental question: Are we working to live, or living to work?