Suggested rewrite: Led a cross-functional initiative that improved [business outcome] by [measurable result], demonstrating experience relevant to this role...
Project Lion – Senior Prompt Engineer – Netherland (Remote, Part-Time)
- Remote from
- Netherlands
- Salary
- Undisclosed
- Department
- Data Science & Analytics
- Employment
- Contract
- Experience
- Senior
- Published
- Apply before
- 8 Dec 2026
- Listing views
- 29
- Application actions
- 2
Make your next move.
Prepare your resume, explore your fit, and draft a cover letter for this opportunity.
About this role.
We are seeking a Prompt Engineer to be responsible for the end-to-end technical migration workflow for transitioning templates to LLM autoraters. The role is required to use client’s internal tools to leverage prompt engineering techniques to maximize model performance.
Responsibilities:
Utilize Automatic Prompt Generation (APG) tools to create baseline prompts for complex parent-child template clusters.
Run and supervise Automated Prompt Optimization (APO) tool, review the outputs, and flag when the APO reaches deadlocks or plateaus.
Manually draft, test, and refine prompts to navigate complex template architectures, overcome anti-patterns, and handle edge cases where tooling is lacking or broken. Solve edge-case scenarios by designing and refining manual prompts.
Monitor shadowbot runs to ensure sufficient disagreements (between human and LLM ratings) are registered, generated, and tracked.
Run prompt versions against established gold data to continuously measure autorater quality against the human crowd baseline, calculating accuracy metrics such as F1 scores, precision, and recall.
Draft technical launch readiness justifications (Launch Certification Documentation) for final.
Requirement:
Language Skills: Native fluency in Dutch and fluent in English.
Location: Must be based in Netherlands.
Education: Bachelor’s, Master’s, or Doctorate degree in Computer Science, Data Science, Computational Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Cognitive Science, or a related analytical field.
Prompt Engineering & AI Expertise: At least 4 years’ experience as Prompt Engineer. Proven experience tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for strict, structured outputs, complex classification tasks, and familiarity with chain-of-thought and few-shot learning.
Data Analysis: Strong proficiency in identifying error patterns, analyzing model performance, and using SQL or other data analytics tools.
Technical Agility: Ability to quickly learn and master proprietary tools with minimal supervision.
Communication: Excellent verbal and written communication skills.
Optional / Preferred Skills:
Familiarity with enterprise-grade LLM interfaces like the Goose API.
Experience in AI model evaluation, data science, computational linguistics, or software engineering.
Hands-on experience with Automated Prompt Optimization (APO) systems or tuning workflows.
Linguistic expertise, including an understanding of semantics and logic.
Compensation
Additional Information
Annual salary information is not provided for this position. Explore salary ranges for similar roles in our Salary Directory ›
This job listing has been manually reviewed by the Jobicy Trust & Safety Team for compliance with our posting guidelines, including verification of the company's legitimacy, accuracy of job details, clarity of remote work policy, and absence of misleading or fraudulent content.
Role DNA
A quick view of the complexity, pace, ownership and collaboration implied by the job description.
Pace & Pressure
4/5Autonomy Level
5/5Communication Load
4/5Salary analysis
Estimated compensation compared with the broader US market for similar roles.
Core skills
Skills and capabilities most closely associated with this opportunity.
Sample interview questions
I would inspect failed and borderline examples, cluster error patterns, and determine whether the issue stems from ambiguous instructions, missing constraints, poor examples, or template structure. I would then create targeted manual prompt variants, test them against gold data, and compare precision, recall, and F1 before selecting a change.
I use a representative gold dataset and compare model decisions with human labels across overall and segment-level metrics. Beyond F1, precision, and recall, I review disagreement patterns, high-risk error categories, edge cases, and consistency across prompt versions, then document residual risks and acceptance criteria.
I define a clear output schema, explicit decision rules, valid and invalid examples, and constraints for handling uncertainty. I validate outputs programmatically where possible and iteratively refine instructions when model responses deviate from the required format or classification logic.
I would query evaluation and production data to segment results by template, label, error type, prompt version, and language. This makes it possible to identify systematic failures, calculate quality metrics, prioritize high-impact issues, and verify whether a new prompt improves performance without creating regressions.
I would document the prompt version, test data coverage, evaluation methodology, key metrics, known limitations, disagreement analysis, fallback behavior, and approval criteria. The document should clearly explain why the solution meets the quality threshold and what monitoring is required after launch.
Apply now.
Follow the employer’s application method and review Jobicy’s safety guidance before sharing personal information.
Continue on the employer website
Protect your personal information and never pay to secure an interview or job offer. .
