Regulatory Compliance Manager (CRCM) – Freelance AI Trainer

Remote from: USA
Salary, yearly, USD: 120,000 - 120,000
Department: Legal & Compliance
Employment type: Full Time,
Job posted: 21 Jun 2026
Apply before: 21 Jul 2026
Experience level: Midweight
Views / Applies: 15 / 3

Mindrift connects AI experts and clients to advance Generative AI models.

Actively Hiring

AI Summary

This freelance role involves designing and evaluating AI training scenarios for regulatory compliance in U.S. consumer banking. Tasks include creating OFAC sanctions cases, compliance testing, and policy gap analysis. Candidates need deep knowledge of regulations like Reg Z, Reg E, and UDAAP, plus credentials like CRCM or CAMS. The work is project-based, requiring 10-20 hours per week. It offers a competitive hourly rate equivalent to $120,000 annual.

Role DNA

Job Complexity

Easy Hard

Pace & Pressure

Relaxed Fast-paced

Autonomy Level

Guided Full Ownership

Communication Load

Independent Highly Collaborative

AI Insight The role requires expert-level knowledge of complex U.S. banking regulations and precise citation skills, making it extremely demanding. Only seasoned compliance professionals or former examiners with credentials like CRCM are suitable.

Salary Analysis

AI Insight The offered salary of $120,000 per year is above the typical market range for compliance managers in the U.S., reflecting the specialized freelance nature and required expertise. It is competitive for those with CRCM or examiner backgrounds.

Key Skills

Regulatory Compliance CRCM OFAC Banking Regulations AI Training Consumer Protection Compliance Testing Policy Analysis Risk Management Project-Based

Cover Letter Sample

I am writing to express my strong interest in the Regulatory Compliance Manager (CRCM) - Freelance AI Trainer position. With over 5 years of hands-on experience in U.S. consumer banking compliance and a current CRCM certification, I have a proven track record in designing compliance testing scenarios and managing OFAC sanctions screening. My background includes working closely with federal examiners and developing policy gap analyses.

I am particularly drawn to the opportunity to apply my citation discipline to train AI systems, ensuring accuracy in regulatory references. My familiarity with Regulation Z, Regulation E, and UDAAP, combined with my experience in examiner response management, aligns well with the project requirements. I am confident in my ability to create high-quality test cases that meet the exacting standards described.

Thank you for considering my application. I look forward to the possibility of contributing to this innovative project.

Possible Interview Questions

Can you describe your experience with designing compliance testing scenarios for consumer banking regulations?

I have over 5 years of experience designing quarterly compliance testing scenarios, including sample selection methodology and test design. For example, I created a testing plan for Regulation E dispute handling that ensured adherence to timing windows and provisional credit obligations.

How do you ensure accuracy when citing regulatory subsections?

I always verify the exact CFR subsection by cross-referencing the official regulation text. I never approximate; if I am uncertain, I flag the issue rather than fabricate a citation. This discipline is critical for AI training to avoid propagating errors.

Describe a time you identified a policy gap where a bank's internal policy contradicted a regulation.

While reviewing a bank's overdraft policy, I found that the disclosure timing did not match Regulation E's requirement for opt-in notices. I documented the gap and provided a revised policy that aligned with the regulation, which was implemented before the next exam cycle.

How do you approach OFAC sanctions screening disposition?

I use a structured false-positive reasoning process: first, I compare the alert details against known OFAC lists and identify potential matches. Then, I evaluate context like name variations or address differences, and document the rationale for releasing or escalating the alert, following the bank's escalation criteria.

What is your experience with examination management?

I have responded to examiner requests by organizing required documents and drafting cover memos. I also tracked remediation of findings in a register, identifying patterns like recurring issues or slipping dates, and ensured timely resolution before the next exam.

Please submit your CV in English and indicate your level of English proficiency.

Mindrift connects specialists with project-based AI opportunities for leading tech companies, focused on testing, evaluating, and improving AI systems. Participation is project-based, not permanent employment.

What this opportunity involves

While each project involves unique tasks, contributors may:

Design and evaluate rule application scenarios — reading a real compliance artifact (advertisement, disclosure, policy) against a specific regulation and citing the exact subsection that applies or is violated;
Write OFAC/sanctions alert disposition cases with structured false-positive reasoning documentation, and escalation scenarios where a transaction must be blocked and reported;
Build quarterly compliance testing scenarios: sample selection methodology, test design, findings documentation, and examiner-ready conclusion memos;
Create Regulation E dispute eligibility cases applying the exact timing windows — 2-day, 60-day, and investigation windows — to specific dispute fact patterns, including liability tier and provisional credit obligations;
Draft examiner request response scenarios testing completeness, format precision, and cover memo quality;
Develop policy gap identification cases where the bank’s internal policy is silent on a regulatory requirement, contradicts the regulation, or has not been updated to reflect a recent change;
Design material-change impact analysis cases: identifying which internal policies, customer disclosures, training modules, and systems are affected by a regulatory update;
Author audit finding remediation tracking scenarios with pattern recognition across a findings register (recurring findings, slipping dates, department-level patterns);
Document all test cases with verified regulatory citations to the specific CFR subsection — never approximated, never fabricated.

What we look for

This opportunity is a good fit for U.S. banking compliance professionals, former federal examiners, and banking-regulatory attorneys open to part-time, non-permanent projects. Ideally, contributors will have:

Degree in Finance, Law, Business, Economics, or related field — or equivalent professional experience; no specific degree is required if credentials (CRCM, CAMS) or examiner background are present;
3+ years of hands-on U.S. consumer banking compliance experience at a bank, consulting firm, or regulatory agency;
Citation discipline as a non-negotiable habit — able to identify the exact CFR subsection that applies and flag uncertainty rather than approximate;
Working knowledge of U.S. consumer protection regulations: Regulation Z (Truth in Lending / TILA), Regulation E (Electronic Fund Transfer Act), Regulation B (ECOA), UDAAP, and related rules;
Familiarity with OFAC sanctions screening disposition logic — structured false-positive reasoning, escalation criteria, documentation requirements;
Experience with examination management: responding to examiner requests, tracking remediation of findings, or conducting compliance testing with attestation memos;
Ability to read an internal policy against its underlying regulation and identify silences, contradictions, and outdated provisions;
CRCM (Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager) or CAMS (Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist) credential is a strong positive signal; former OCC, Fed, FDIC, or CFPB examiner status is equally strong;
JD with banking-regulatory practice is a strong signal for citation-heavy tasks;
Strong written English (C1+).

How it works

Apply → Pass qualification(s) → Join a project → Complete tasks → Get paid

Project time expectations

For this project, tasks are estimated to require around 10–20 hours per week during active phases, based on project requirements. This is an estimate, not a guaranteed workload, and applies only while the project is active.

Compensation

On this project, contributors can earn up to $60 per hour equivalent, depending on their level and pace of contribution.

Compensation varies across projects depending on scope, complexity, and required expertise. Please note that other projects on the platform may offer different earning levels based on their requirements.

Apply now >