During a video interview, the manager assumed I could attend daily meetings in their time zone, even though the posting said distributed. Should I clarify my availability in a follow-up now, and how directly should I ask whether those meetings are mandatory?
1 Answer
-
Send a short follow-up now that treats this as a scheduling requirement, not a challenge. The important issue isn’t the manager’s assumption; it’s whether recurring attendance during those hours is essential to doing the job.
Say: “Could you clarify the expected cadence and whether daily meetings in [time zone] are mandatory for this role? I’m available [your relevant overlap], and I’d like to confirm the working-hours expectations.”
Be direct about any hard constraint rather than promising flexibility you can’t sustain. A distributed posting can still mean a team operates around a core schedule, and that may be reasonable if the role depends on live coordination.
Use this criterion: if the meeting time would regularly conflict with your fixed availability, clarify before the process advances.
Would those daily meetings fall outside hours you can consistently work?
Want to answer?
Log in or create an account to post answers, vote, and build your professional profile.
Log in or registerHow thoughtful discussions stay useful
How we moderate answers
We review contributions for clear, actionable, professionally relevant guidance. Duplicate, promotional, low-quality, or unsupported content may be removed.
What makes a high-quality answer
Strong answers directly address the question, explain the reasoning, and include specific steps, examples, tools, or frameworks when they add value.
Expert participation rules
Professional expertise should be grounded in real experience and presented objectively. Answers must stay career-focused and avoid undisclosed promotion.