Dutch Accessibility Tester

Remote from: Europe
Annual salary: Undisclosed
Salary information is not provided for this position. Check our Salary Directory to estimate the average compensation for similar roles.
Department: QA & Testing
Employment type: Full Time,
Job posted: 26 Jul 2026
Apply before: 26 Aug 2026
Experience level: Entry-Level
Junior
Views / Applies: 19 / 2

About company

About Welo Global

Smarter AI. Better Business.

Computer Software
2006

Actively Hiring

AI Summary

This role involves validating the accessibility of Dutch-language digital content, including web pages and documents, for Welocalize. The tester will perform language validation, screen reader testing, and multimedia accessibility reviews using tools like JAWS and NVDA. The position is project-based, requiring native Dutch fluency and knowledge of WCAG 2.1/2.2 and EN 301 549 standards. Defect reporting and collaboration with QA leads are also part of the responsibilities. This is a contract role suitable for experienced accessibility testers with strong Dutch language skills.

Role DNA

Job Complexity

Easy Hard

Pace & Pressure

Relaxed Fast-paced

Autonomy Level

Guided Full Ownership

Communication Load

Independent Highly Collaborative

AI Insight The role requires a combination of native Dutch fluency, technical accessibility knowledge, and hands-on experience with assistive technologies, which is moderately specialized but not extremely rare.

Salary Analysis

AI Insight The salary range for this role typically falls between $50,000 and $80,000 per year, depending on experience and project volume. Since the job posting does not specify a salary, the offered compensation may be competitive for the freelance accessibility testing market.

Core Skills Required

Dutch Accessibility Testing WCAG Screen Reader Testing PDF Accessibility Localization Quality Assurance Assistive Technology JAWS NVDA

Cover Letter Sample

Dear Hiring Manager,

I am writing to express my interest in the Dutch Accessibility Tester position at Welocalize. With native fluency in Dutch and extensive experience in digital accessibility testing, I am confident in my ability to ensure that localized content meets both technical standards and real-world usability for assistive technology users.

My hands-on expertise with screen readers such as JAWS, NVDA, and VoiceOver, combined with my knowledge of WCAG 2.1/2.2 and EN 301 549, allows me to perform thorough language validation and accessibility audits. I have a strong track record of reporting defects clearly and collaborating effectively with QA teams.

I am eager to contribute to your projects and help maintain high-quality, accessible digital experiences for Dutch-speaking users. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

Sample Interview Questions

Can you describe your experience testing digital content with assistive technologies like JAWS or NVDA?

I have over three years of experience testing web and document accessibility using JAWS and NVDA. I focus on verifying that all elements, including hidden text and dynamic content, are properly announced and functional for screen reader users.

How do you ensure that translated Dutch content remains accessible and natural for native speakers?

I review translated text for accuracy and natural phrasing, checking that alt text, labels, and error messages read well in Dutch. I also validate language codes and identify mixed-language content that may confuse screen readers.

What is your process for reporting accessibility defects?

I log defects in a tracking system like Jira, including WCAG references, severity, and supporting screenshots or recordings. I prioritize clear, concise descriptions to facilitate quick resolution.

Can you explain the difference between technical compliance and real-world usability for screen reader users?

Technical compliance means meeting WCAG success criteria, while real-world usability ensures that content is actually easy to navigate and understand with a screen reader. For example, a compliant alt text may be present but poorly phrased, making it useless for users.

What tools do you use for PDF accessibility testing, and what do you look for?

I use PAC 3 and Adobe Acrobat Pro to check PDF tags, reading order, and language declarations. I also test with screen readers to ensure the document is navigable and that all content is accessible.

About Welocalize

Welocalize, a Welo Global brand, serves localization teams through AI-enabled multilingual content solutions that enable enterprises to operate and scale globally. Welocalize combines AI, automation, and human expertise to support enterprises in more than 300 languages, enabling accurate, culturally aligned, and compliant multilingual content at scale.

About the Role

Welocalize is expanding its network of accessibility testers to validate the language-specific accessibility of localized digital content: web pages, applications, and documents.
You will serve as a native-language expert reviewer, confirming that accessibility elements not only survive translation but are accurate, understandable, and functional in the target language (Dutch).
This role requires fluency in the target language, hands-on experience with assistive technology in that language, and familiarity with Digital Accessibility standards and guidelines such as PDF/UA, WCAG 2.1 & 2.2, and EN 301 549 to complement accessibility testing done internally.
Work is assigned on a project basis. You will receive a defined scope, a testing checklist, and access credentials. Findings are reported in a structured defect log and specific bug tracking system.

What You Will Do

The actual scope will vary by assignment, but the general extent of this role is outlined below.

Language Validation: Confirm correct language codes in HTML and PDF metadata, and identify mixed-language content missing proper declarations.
In-Language Screen Reader Testing: Using native-language screen readers (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, TalkBack, or Narrator), review translated accessible text — including hidden elements, tooltips, error messages, alt text, and UI labels — for accuracy, natural phrasing, and clarity when read aloud.
Multimedia Accessibility Review: Evaluate captions, transcripts, and audio descriptions for accuracy, synchronization, and natural language, and confirm multimedia controls are properly labeled in the target language.
Defect Reporting: Log findings with WCAG/PDF-UA references, supporting screenshots or recordings, and severity classifications; participate in review calls with the QA Lead as needed.

What We Are Looking For

Required

Native or near-native fluency in Dutch; you are the authoritative voice on whether translated content reads naturally and is understandable.
Demonstrated hands-on experience testing digital content with assistive technology/AT.
Working knowledge of WCAG 2.1 & 2.2 AA and EN 301 549.
Ability to evaluate content from a native-speaker accessibility perspective — not just technical compliance, but real-world usability for screen reader users who speak the language.
Reliable access to relevant devices and operating systems to replicate real-world usage in the target locale.

Nice to have

Strong written communication skills in English for defect reporting and general communications.
Experience with PDF accessibility testing using PAC 3 or Adobe Acrobat Pro Accessibility Checker.
Familiarity with internationalization, localization, and translation workflows; understanding of how accessibility elements can be affected during format conversion.
Personal use of assistive technology.

Tools and Environment

Welocalize provides access credentials and a structured test plan per engagement. Testers are expected to supply their own device and assistive technology setup appropriate to the target locale.
Commonly used tools in this role include:
- Screen readers: JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver (macOS/iOS), TalkBack (Android), Narrator (Windows)
- Browser/screen reader pairings aligned to the target locale’s most common usage patterns
- Caption and transcript review: native video players, .srt/.vtt file review
- PDF accessibility: PAC 3, Adobe Acrobat Pro (provided where required)
- Defect logging: Jira bug tracking system is most frequently used

What to Expect

Assignments are project-based with clear scope documents, test checklists, and agreed turnaround timelines provided before work begins.
Scope for each engagement will specify the exact language, content type, pages or documents in scope, and priority areas.
You will not be expected to remediate or fix issues; your role is testing and reporting.
Welocalize values feedback: if checklist items are unclear or a finding falls outside the defined scope, flag it and we will address it.

How to Apply

Click on Apply Now button and share with us the following:
- A brief introduction covering your language, screen reader experience, and accessibility background.
- Any relevant certifications (CPACC, WAS, DHS Trusted Tester, or equivalent).

Apply now >