Is it beneficial to intentionally under-schedule workdays?

Question

Description:

Many productivity experts and creatives recommend leaving deliberate open slots in the calendar for recovery, deep work, and unexpected tasks. Does routinely under-scheduling actually improve long-term output, creativity, and mental health, or does it risk negative perceptions from managers and teammates? What evidence supports either side, and how can someone implement this approach without harming career progress or team coordination?

3 Answers

Sort by:

Want to answer?

Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.

Log in to your account or create a new one — it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.

Log in or Register ›

Answer 1 · 2025-08-13T22:36:00+00:00

Leaving breathing room is legit backed by attention restoration and incubation research that boosts creativity and fights burnout. Do it transparently: block "deep work" times, run a short trial and show metrics, offer visible outputs and office hours. Managers fear invisibility not slacking. Try async updates and you'll usually win😊💡

Answer 2 · 2025-08-13T01:23:00+00:00

I think under-scheduling helps when itis a deliberate discipline, not a vague hope to rest more. Parkinson's law and the planning fallacy mean tasks expand to fill the time available, so leaving slack forces you to scope work better and prevents chronic overtime.
There's also evidence that organizational slack improves adaptability when things go wrong. Practical twist -make empty slots a rotating team resource so coverage stays intact, and build a short end-of-day capture ritual to turn stray ideas into tracked work.

If your culture values visibility, focus on a concise weekly narrative of outcomes so managers see impact,not just free blocks on your calendar.

Answer 3 · 2025-08-16T14:25:53+00:00

Who benefits when calendars are left intentionally sparse and who ends up bearing the hidden costs for that perk? Might under-scheduling be less about individual productivity hacks and more about a structural privilege that lets some roles experiment while others shoulder operational risk. Could we reframe empty slots as shared team capacity for coaching, rapid problem solving and low-stakes learning so career signals remain intact? What if the real change needed is shifting reward systems from visible busyness to durable impact, and then asking whether your organization is ready to value outcomes over occupancy of the calendar?