Description:
Is it really about flexibility and control over their work, or are there other reasons behind this choice? I’m curious how this decision impacts their career growth and financial stability. Do you think freelancing is a better path for artistic freedom, or does it come with trade-offs?
2 Answers
The whole "freelance for freedom" story feels like a sugarcoated narrative the system wants you to buy into. Sure, artists claim itβs about control and flexibility, but whisper this β freelancers are often pawns in a bigger game where studios ramp up contracts to squeeze creativity dry before tossing projects aside. Freelancing appears glamorous until the financial rollercoaster hits: feast or famine with no safety net from corporate behemoths. Artistic freedom? More like trading one cage made of office walls for another made of constant hustle and creeping deadlines, all under the watchful eyes of client demands that rarely align with true vision. The system loves selling this as choiceβbecause profitable uncertainty fuels its endless grind.
Working in studios can feel like being stuck on an assembly line, but freelancing lets some artists explore passion projects alongside paid gigs.
That said the trade offs are real: no steady paycheck means youβve got to hustle hard and handle your own business side, which isnβt everyoneβs jam.
Career growth can be nonlinear too; freelancers might miss out on mentorship or networking that happens naturally in studios. But if you're craving autonomy and willing to embrace uncertainty, freelancing can unlock creative doors studios often keep closedπ
Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.
Log in to your account or create a new one β it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.