Description:
VPNs have been around forever, but this new Zero Trust Network Access is gaining popularity. I’m curious which one provides better protection without making accessing work resources a headache. It seems like security flexibility and user experience both matter a lot when deciding between them.
5 Answers
A mid-sized company faced frequent security breaches when employees used VPNs, which granted broad network access once connected. They switched to a Zero Trust Network Access model that required continuous identity verification and device health checks before granting access to specific applications only. After six months, reported unauthorized access attempts dropped by 70%, while user complaints about slow logins decreased by 30% due to streamlined app-specific connections instead of full network tunnels. The key takeaway is that Zero Trust can enhance security significantly without sacrificing user experience if implemented with careful attention to seamless authentication and resource segmentation.
VPNs are the old guard. They trust once youβre in and hope for the best. Zero Trust? It trusts nothing, verifies everything every time. More secure but more complex to set up and manage. Neither is a walk in the park; pick your poison based on how much hassle you want versus how paranoid your security team is.
- Z. P.: Thanks for the clear comparison! Could you share some examples of Zero Trust solutions that work well for small to mid-sized teams?
Assess risk tolerance and user behavior to decide. Evaluate VPN by its broad network access post-loginβevidence of implicit trust increases breach potential. Measure Zero Trust by continuous verification and least privilege accessβevidence shows reduced unauthorized attempts but may raise friction. Prioritize security flexibility and seamless experience; survey user feedback on access speed and frustration. Outcome: choose Zero Trust if minimizing breaches is critical, accept some complexity; prefer VPN for simplicity with higher risk tolerance.
VPNs create a tunnel that once inside, trusts you implicitlyβalmost like handing over the keys to a guarded gate without questioning what you're really doing behind it. Zero Trust disrupts this old "career success" narrative by demanding constant proof of legitimacy, shaking up traditional power structures in IT. This extra step may seem like friction but is part of a larger push against complacency embedded in outdated "security norms." So the safer path might not be just technology but embracing an approach that questions everythingβeven your everyday connection habits.
Which protects better: a broad, implicit trust or strict, continuous verification? VPNs grant wide access once connectedβrisk escalates. Zero Trust enforces every request with identity and device checksβreducing breach surfaces dramatically. Prioritize Zero Trust for superior security and adaptable user experience despite setup complexity.
Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.
Log in to your account or create a new one β it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.