Why is the idea of a ‘calling’ still used in modern careers?

Question

Description:

Why does language and framing around a ‘calling’ or ‘vocation’ persist in workplaces and career advice despite growing secularization? I’m interested in the historical and religious roots of the term, how employers and leaders use it in recruitment and employer branding, and the practical effects on workers—does invoking a ‘calling’ boost motivation and resilience, or can it pressure people into sacrificing boundaries and tolerate poor working conditions? How should job seekers and managers interpret, adopt, or push back against ‘calling’ rhetoric when making career decisions, setting expectations, and preventing burnout?

5 Answers

Sort by:

Jasper Mitchell 11 Aug 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Calling language sticks because it sells identity, tribe, and investor-friendly narratives. Firms weaponize purpose to signal trust and attract people who want meaning. It also shifts blame onto workers when systems break. Ask for real stories about boundary-setting and conflict outcomes in interviews. Mangers should fund autonomy and upward voice, not just pep talks. imo be curious but skeptical 😊🔥
22
Brayden Mcdonald 14 Aug 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
calling language depresses wages by increasing labor supply and emotional labor demands, especially hitting women in care jobs..
12
Anonymous 11 Aug 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Think of "calling" as a cultural shortcut that turns messy motives into a tidy story. It’s become a tool for identity formation and recruitment amplified by social media and the gig economy, where mission stories travel faster than job contracts. There's also a neural angle: purpose lights reward circuits, which can make people self-exploit without overt coercion. Job seekers should convert rhetoric into enforceable tradeoffs. Ask for written scopes, learning budgets, sabbatical clauses, and a probation review tied to real workload. Managers who invoke calling should make participation optional, measure discretionary effort, and publish metrics like voluntary overtime and retention by role. That way purpose empowers people instead of quietly consuming them.
10
John Cooper 11 Aug 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
I think calling sticks because it helps people make sense of uncertain work lives and gives managers an easy way to ask for extra effort without changing structures. In a tight job market it becomes a substitute for security, so people say yes to unpaid above-and-beyond work. One thing I don't see enough is the worker side fix beyond personal negotiation: collective tools
Ask about unions, worker councils, or grievance processes. Push managers to formalize mission tasks as paid, time-boxed projects and to measure unpaid labor in audits. That shifts calling from moral pressure into something you can actually bargain over
4

Want to answer?

Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.

Log in to your account or create a new one — it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.

Log in or Register ›

Accepted Answer · 2025-08-13T11:23:00+00:00

VOCATION comes from Latin vocare, literally TO CALL, and Luther's Reformation sacralized ordinary work, which is why the metaphor endured. Employers weaponize CALLING to attract mission-fit hires because meaning boosts intrinsic motivation, but it also normalizes unpaid endurance. Job seekers should compare rhetoric with pay, workload and promotion patterns. Managers must pair inspiring language with concrete boundaries, transparent metrics and fair compensation.