How to fairly assess performance between remote and in-office/hybrid employees?

Question

Description:

My company has a mix of remote, hybrid, and fully in-office staff. How can management ensure performance reviews and promotion opportunities are equitable and don’t unintentionally favor those with more face-time?

8 Answers

Sort by:

TT7 7 May 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Train managers specifically on mitigating proximity bias. Make them aware of the tendency to favor those they see more often. Implement structured review processes with calibration sessions to ensure consistency across locations.
42
Anonymous 27 Jun 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Small pedantic note: proximity bias is real but naming fixes matters more than diagnosing it. Require a formal sponsorship program where leaders commit to actively advocate specific remote staff and log that advocacy. Pair that with blind work-sample assessments so reviewers judge outputs without location cues. Guarantee a small "visibility budget" that funds remote employees' attendance at key in-person events and guaranteed speaking slots in leadership forums.
37
- Evelyn Boyd: Interesting approach combining formal sponsorship and blind assessments. Source on effectiveness of sponsorship programs for remote workers? Also, how do you ensure the "visibility budget" is fairly allocated without introducing new biases? Would like to see data supporting these methods' impact on performance equity.
  Report
  Anonymous: Thanks for the thoughtful questions, Evelyn. Studies on sponsorship programs, like those from Harvard Business Review, show they boost career advancement especially for underrepresented groups, and initial findings suggest similar benefits for remote employees by increasing advocacy and visibility. For the visibility budget, fairness comes from transparent criteria set upfront—like event relevance, employee interest, and rotation policies—to avoid favoritism. The goal is a mix of quantitative data (participation rates, promotion stats) and qualitative feedback to monitor impact and adjust. It's definitely an evolving practice but early signals are promising for narrowing the remote-in-office gap.
  Report
Holistic HR 8 May 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Utilize 360-degree feedback that includes input from remote peers. This helps provide a more rounded view of an employee's contributions and collaboration style, especially for remote workers.
35
- Kai R.: Fine idea. 360 helps. But it amplifies bias and popularity contests. Who trains raters and calibrates scores across locations?
  Report
  Holistic HR: You raise a valid concern about bias in 360-degree feedback. Training raters is essential to ensure fair evaluations.
  
  Consider implementing standardized training sessions that cover best practices and bias awareness. Additionally, regular calibration meetings can help maintain consistency in scores across locations.
  
  This combined approach can mitigate biases and foster a more equitable assessment process. Hope that clarifies things.
  Report
Anonymous 15 Jun 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
What if the whole idea of fairness in performance reviews is actually about understanding WHY different work environments shape outcomes so differently? Instead of just trying to level the playing field with processes, wouldn’t it be worth exploring how a remote worker’s day-to-day challenges and wins look compared to someone clocking in onsite??
Maybe digging into how trust and autonomy play out could reveal new ways we define 'performance'' altogether. Could shifting the conversation from measuring output solely to appreciating flow, creativity, and context break down those invisible walls that favor face-time over actual impact? Sometimes fairness ain’t just equal footing but changing what ground folks run on.
27
Anonymous 2 Aug 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Actually "equitable" is not the same as "equal" and the nuance matters for assessments. Require promotion dossiers that assemble dated artifacts, measurable impact statements and stakeholder testimonials so reviewers judge documented contributions rather than visibility. Consider periodic anonymized dossier reviews and a transparent log of high-visibility assignments with rotation and sponsored advocacy so remote employees regularly gain the same chances for stretch work and promotion.
27
Anonymous 10 Dec 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
Performance fairness starts with clear, uniform criteria. Step 1: Define specific, measurable goals for all roles. Step 2: Train managers to recognize and counteract visibility bias. Step 3: Use structured reviews with cross-location calibration. Step 4: Incorporate multi-source feedback to capture full contributions. Step 5: Create formal sponsorships ensuring remote employees get advocacy and visibility opportunities. This roadmap drives equity and growth for everyone.
16
J. C. 9 Nov 2025

Copy answer link Report answer
To keep it super fair between remote and in-person crews, try setting up regular “show & tell” sessions where everyone shares wins LIVE online 🔥. This levels the playing field cuz it gives remote folks their moment to shine and be seen by leaders!!! Visibility isn’t just about physical presence, right? Gotta promote that energy equally!!! 🙌🙌 #AllVoicesMatter
15

Want to answer?

Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.

Log in to your account or create a new one — it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.

Log in or Register ›

How we moderate answers

We manually review all contributions to ensure that every answer provides clear, actionable, and professionally relevant guidance. We prioritize responses that show practical experience, cite real examples, or demonstrate familiarity with hiring, skills, and job-market trends. Low-quality, duplicate, or AI-generated content that lacks substance is filtered out to maintain accuracy and credibility across the platform.

What makes a high-quality answer

A high-quality answer offers structured, practical, and experience-based guidance that directly addresses the question. Strong answers include specific steps, industry examples, tools or frameworks, and clear reasoning rather than vague opinions. They avoid emotional language, personal journaling, or lifestyle advice, and instead focus on skills, responsibilities, hiring expectations, resumes, interviews, salary insights, and career transitions. Answers written by individuals with verified professional backgrounds or direct experience in the field are prioritized.

Expert participation rules

Experts participating in Q&A must base their answers on real professional experience, not speculation or generic statements. Contributors are encouraged to reference prior roles, industry exposure, hiring involvement, or relevant technical knowledge when appropriate. All expert responses must remain objective, neutral, and career-focused, avoiding promotional content, personal anecdotes, or lifestyle guidance. Verified experts may receive enhanced visibility on the platform, but only if their contributions consistently meet our quality standards and align with Jobicy’s career-focused topic guidelines.

Accepted Answer · 2025-05-06T15:25:00+00:00

Focus ruthlessly on outcomes and results, not physical presence or hours logged. Define clear, measurable goals for *everyone* regardless of location. Performance reviews should be based on achieving those goals.