Description:
My new remote job offers ‘unlimited PTO’. Sounds amazing, but I’ve heard mixed things. Is it a genuine employee benefit, or does it subtly pressure people into taking *less* time off, especially in a remote setting where work can bleed into personal time?
11 Answers
It HEAVILY depends on company culture. If leadership actively takes and encourages vacation, and there's no unspoken pressure to be 'always on', it can be great. If not, it often means people take less time off due to guilt or fear of falling behind/being seen as less committed.
It can be a trap. Without a defined number of days, there's no 'use it or lose it' incentive. People often default to taking minimal time, especially high achievers. Ask current employees how much vacation they *actually* take and if they feel supported doing so.
The biggest downside for me was no payout of unused vacation time if you leave the company, because there's no 'accrued' time. That can be a significant financial difference compared to traditional PTO policies.
Some companies with unlimited PTO also implement *minimum* vacation day requirements (e.g., everyone must take at least 3 weeks). This is a good sign that they are serious about employee well-being and not just using it as a cost-saving measure.
It puts the onus on YOU to advocate for your time off. You need to be proactive in planning and communicating it. In a good culture, this is fine. In a high-pressure one, it's tough.
I love it. I take more time off now than I did with a fixed amount because I don't have to hoard days 'just in case'. But my manager is super supportive and models taking time off himself. It's all about the culture.
For remote teams, it can be even harder because the visibility of who is taking time off might be lower. Clear team calendars and out-of-office messages are crucial. And managers should actively check in on PTO usage.
Make sure there are clear processes for requesting and getting approval for time off. 'Unlimited' doesn't mean 'take off whenever with no notice'. It still needs to be coordinated with team needs.
What if the true value of "unlimited PTO" is not how many days you get but who is held accountable for ensuring people actually use them? Instead of only worrying about payout and guilt, ask HR for anonymized average PTO by role and tenure and push for managers to have a metric tied to team rest levels in their performance reviews. That shifts the burden from individuals to leadership and makes unlimited a lived reality not a slogan. Would you take the job if leaders had to prove they keep teams rested and rest showed up in their evaluations?
unlimited pto often sounds great but can blur boundaries more in remote work. without clear limits, some might overwork to prove they're "present."
Consider unlimited PTO as a contract negotiation point, not just a perk. Companies sometimes offer it to reduce payroll liabilities and avoid paying out accrued days when someone leaves.Thats legal in many places, but it changes the financial calculus compared with banked PTO.
****
ask HR for a written addendum: a minimum guaranteed number of paid days, a clear statement that taking time off wonβt be held against you in reviews, and how termination payouts are handled. If they resist, thatβs a signal. Also propose a quarterly check where your manager confirms youβve actually used reasonable rest time.That makes the policy less theortical and protects you from it becoming an unspoken penalty for disconnecting.
Join the conversation and help others by sharing your insights.
Log in to your account or create a new one β it only takes a minute and gives you the ability to post answers, vote, and build your expert profile.